Tuesday, May 29, 2007 - GP holiday assignment 1- Freedom of expression or social responsibility? :

Question: Singer believes that freedom of expression is essential to any democracy and therefore should not be limited. On the other hand, Szilagyi believes that more focus should be placed on social responsibility. In the context of Singapore’s multi-racial society, where there is cultural ad religious pluralism, which author’s view do you think should be adopted?

Upon reflecting on the articles written by Singer and Szilagyi, I have reached a realisation that many demonstrations, protests and riots occurring in this world stems out from religious differences which result in differing views and opinion on issues, straining relationships and deepening rifts between countries. They refuse to give way, insensitive to other religious beliefs and give no hesitation in criticising others’ sacred beliefs. For 17 years I have lived in democratic Singapore, cases of racial discrimination and condemnation of religious figures are few to count. I believe that in Singapore’s multi- racial society, where there is cultural and religious pluralism, more focus should be placed on social responsibility (Szilagzi’s view) rather than freedom of expression.

To begin with, let me emphasize that by stating my stand here does not mean I feel that freedom of expression should be disregarded. Freedom of expression refers to the right to express personal opinions freely. It is important to an extent that it allows sharing of different views from people of various racial groups, hence exposing us to diverse opinions. The government can also judge from these views whether a certain policy receives favourable response and from there, the government can make amendments to existing policies to suit the welfare of its citizens.

However, freedom of expression can lead to harmful consequences too. As seen in the previous years, several bloggers have been arrested for posting racist remarks on the web. It reflects on us how irresponsible these people are in posting such hurtful and insensitive comments about other religions without considerations of the possible consequences they may face. Hence, I strongly believe that the key to a democratic society is to practise social responsibility.

So the next question one may ponder upon is, how do we practise social responsibility and in what way should the government promote this value among Singaporeans? Well, practising it is actually quite simple. In my opinion, we can do our part by simply ensuring that we do not express negative remarks about racial beliefs or criticize any religious figures. For example, Jesus Christ, Buddha, monks, etcetera. Singaporeans must be sensitive to racial issues and avoid finger pointing and recriminations in the aftermath of racial disputes. Second, in a nation with racial diversity, Singaporeans should learn to tolerate different cultures so that there would be racial harmony. Interacting with our neighbours of various religions help in social bonding, hence citizens would learn to appreciate diverse values and foster stronger ties with people of different races.

I think that to place more focus on social responsibility, the government must take on an active role in promoting this value among Singaporeans. First, I believe that the government should monitor the media’s progress in ‘leading an informed, high quality discussion, with due respect for minority rights’ as mentioned in the article. The media should be careful in carrying out discussions by not depicting biasedness, revealing racist cartoons and jokes. In addition, the government could hold dialogue sessions to further emphasize the role of citizens in practising social responsibility. I feel strongly that it is especially important for the younger generations of today to actively participate in these events because this value should be instilled in them from young so that they can lead Singapore well in future.

To end off, I believe that should freedom of expression be limited and social responsibility be widely promoted, Singapore would be a democratic country with a diverse racial pool of citizens living harmoniously together as a nation.

The future ain't what it used to be. hugged teddy at 1:40 AM